
Jon
University of Edinburgh
Thu, 07/05/2007 - 19:49
There's never enough time! I've been very busy at the moment and unfortunately lower priority things have fallen by the wayside - like GeologyRocks. I have a heap of photos to upload. I have another 4 "field guides" to do (half written though). I also have a book review to write (again half written at least). And then there's the updated style - it looks tonnes better than the current one, works in every browser (with no wierdness) and has a heap of new (and requested by the users) features. I will get this lot done soon...but for now...
So what have I been doing? 1) PhD corrections were started. Hopefully they'll be done in time for me to graduate this winter. This puts me in a bit of strange situation. I am supervising a Masters student this summer - he'll graduate on the same day! Not completely wierd, but a bit odd. 2) Supervising Masters student - interesting project porting QCD (that's Quantum ChromoDynamics) code the the Cell processor (the one in the PlayStation 3 - and no we don't have one
) 3) Writing up some papers.
Anyway...best get on with something useful!
Comments
I know how you feel! I can't
I know how you feel! I can't believe it's July already! (and we still haven't had any sort of Summer yet...) Time just slips away from me, but I think that might be because I'm getting old, I need to start carrying a little pen and paper around, tied with a piece of string around my neck, so I can make lists. Or, better still a dictaphone!
Note to self: Buy Dictaphone.
Anyway, just out of interest, as I have no idea how the PhD process works, who tells you that you have to make corrections to your work? Do they point out large parts of work that need re-doing or just stuff like typo's, appendicies & the like?
I'm looking forward to the new style for GR, good luck with it!
PhD Process
Anyway, just out of interest, as I have no idea how the PhD process works, who tells you that you have to make corrections to your work? Do they point out large parts of work that need re-doing or just stuff like typo's, appendicies & the like?
The PhD process is that you hand in your thesis in temporary binding. You actually hand in 3 copies. You have 2 examiners - one internal (i.e. part of the same department from which you are graduating) and one external (i.e. from another University, or in my case, from Shell). They then read your thesis and you then have your viva. The viva (I did mine in Feb this year) is essentially an opportunity for the exminers to ask questions on your thesis and for you to "defend" your work. After the viva the examiners make recommendations to the University exam board. These are
So once you've done your corrections , in the case of 1 & 2, your internal checks over the final thesis and if they give you the go ahead you submit the final bound version to the University. With 3 both or just the internal might want to check your thesis before clearing it. 4 requires that you go through the viva process again. 5, you just hand in a bound version with some minor editorial corrections done.
Does that make sense?
I'm looking forward to the new style for GR, good luck with it!
It is just about done. I need to test out the pages to make sure everything works well - it takes a lot of time I also need to figure out how to update the current site easily with the new features - it's not trivial!